← back to finance

Efficient Markets

OpenStax Principles of Finance (CC BY 4.0) · MIT OCW 15.401 (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

The Efficient Market Hypothesis says prices fully reflect available information. You can't consistently beat the market because by the time you know something, the price already moved. The debate is over how much information "available" includes.

Strong: all information (incl. insider) Semi-strong: all public information Weak: past prices Three forms of market efficiency.

Three forms of efficiency

Weak form: prices reflect all past trading data. Technical analysis cannot produce excess returns. Semi-strong form: prices reflect all publicly available information. Fundamental analysis cannot beat the market either. Strong form: prices reflect all information, public and private. Even insiders cannot profit. Each stronger form subsumes the one below it.

Scheme

Random walk hypothesis

If markets are efficient, price changes are unpredictable. The random walk model says tomorrow's price equals today's price plus a random shock: Pₜ₊₁ = Pₜ + εₜ. This does not mean prices are random — it means changes are random. A stock can trend upward on average (drift) while its daily moves remain unpredictable.

Scheme

Event studies

An event study tests semi-strong efficiency by measuring how quickly prices adjust to new information. Calculate abnormal returns — actual return minus expected return — around the event date. If the market is semi-strong efficient, all adjustment happens immediately: abnormal returns cluster at day zero with no drift before or after.

Scheme

Anomalies and challenges to EMH

Several persistent patterns challenge the EMH. The January effect: small stocks outperform in January. The momentum effect: past winners keep winning for 3-12 months. The value premium: high book-to-market stocks earn more than growth stocks. Defenders argue these are compensation for risk; critics say they're evidence of behavioral biases. The debate is unresolved.

Scheme
Neighbors