← back to real analysis

Sequences and Limits

Jiří Lebl · Basic Analysis I, Ch. 2 · CC BY-SA 4.0

A sequence converges to L if, for every ε > 0, all but finitely many terms lie within ε of L. Completeness guarantees that every bounded monotone sequence converges and every Cauchy sequence converges.

n L L+ε L-ε Eventually, all terms stay inside the ε-band.

Convergence: the epsilon-N definition

A sequence (a_n) converges to L if for every ε > 0, there exists N such that for all n ≥ N, |a_n - L| < ε. The key: you pick any ε, no matter how small, and I produce an N that works.

Scheme

Limit theorems

Limits respect arithmetic: if a_n → a and b_n → b, then a_n + b_n → a + b, a_n * b_n → a * b, and (if b ≠ 0) a_n / b_n → a / b. The squeeze theorem: if a_n ≤ c_n ≤ b_n and both a_n and b_n converge to L, then c_n → L.

Scheme

Monotone convergence theorem

Every bounded, monotone sequence converges. If a sequence is increasing and bounded above, it converges to its supremum. This is a direct consequence of the completeness axiom.

Scheme

Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem

Every bounded sequence has a convergent subsequence. This is the wpBolzano-Weierstrass theorem, the key compactness result for sequences. Even if a sequence doesn't converge (like (-1)^n), some subsequence does.

Scheme

Cauchy sequences

A sequence is Cauchy if its terms get arbitrarily close to each other: for every ε, there exists N such that |a_m - a_n| < ε for all m, n ≥ N. In the reals, a sequence converges if and only if it is Cauchy. This equivalence is another way to state completeness.

Scheme

Notation reference

Symbol Scheme Meaning
lim a_n = L(find-N epsilon)Convergence: terms approach L
|a_n - L| < ε(< (abs (- an L)) eps)Within epsilon of the limit
Cauchy|a_m - a_n| < εTerms get close to each other
BW theoremsubsequenceBounded seq has convergent subseq
Neighbors

Translation notes

We compute convergence numerically but the real content is the proofs. The epsilon-N definition is an existence statement: "there exists N such that..." Our code finds a specific N, which is stronger than existence but weaker than a proof that it always works.