← back to proofs

Cardinality

Jim Hefferon · GFDL + CC BY-SA 2.5 · Introduction to Proofs

Two sets have the same cardinality when there is a bijection between them. The natural numbers and the even numbers have the same cardinality (both countably infinite). But the real numbers have strictly larger cardinality. Cantor proved this with his diagonal argument.

Cantor's diagonal argument r1 = 0. 5 1 7 0 3 ... r2 = 0. 3 9 2 8 4 ... r3 = 0. 7 4 1 5 6 ... r4 = 0. 0 0 6 2 9 ... r5 = 0. 8 3 0 7 7 ... d = 0. 6 0 2 3 8 ... d differs from every rn at position n so d is not in the list. The reals are uncountable.

Finite cardinality

Two finite sets have the same cardinality when they have the same number of elements. A bijection between them pairs each element of one with exactly one element of the other.

Scheme

Countably infinite sets

A set is countably infinite if there is a bijection with the natural numbers. The even numbers are countable: n maps to 2n. The integers are countable: 0, 1, -1, 2, -2, 3, -3, ... . The rationals are countable (by a more clever listing). Countable infinity is the "smallest" infinity.

Scheme

Cantor's diagonal argument

Theorem: the real numbers in [0, 1] are uncountable. Proof by contradiction: suppose we can list all reals r1, r2, r3, ... . Construct a new real d whose n-th digit differs from the n-th digit of rn. Then d is not in the list (it differs from every rn at position n). This contradicts the assumption that the list was complete.

Scheme

The continuum hypothesis

wpCantor showed |N| is less than |R|. Is there a set with cardinality strictly between them? The wpcontinuum hypothesis says no. wpGodel (1940) showed it is consistent with ZFC. wpCohen (1963) showed its negation is also consistent. The question is undecidable from the standard axioms of set theory.

Scheme
Neighbors