← back to proofs

Contrapositive and Contradiction

Jim Hefferon · GFDL + CC BY-SA 2.5 · Introduction to Proofs

When a direct proof is hard, try an indirect route. Proof by contrapositive proves "if not Q then not P" instead of "if P then Q" (they are logically equivalent). Proof by contradiction assumes the negation and derives something impossible.

Goal: prove P → Q Direct: P → ... → Q Contrapositive: ~Q → ~P Contradiction: ~Q → ! P → Q proved

Proof by contrapositive

"If P then Q" is logically equivalent to "if not Q then not P." Sometimes the contrapositive direction is easier. Example: if n^2 is even, then n is even. Direct proof is awkward. Contrapositive: if n is odd, then n^2 is odd. That is straightforward algebra.

Scheme

Proof by contradiction

To prove statement S, assume not-S and derive a contradiction (any statement that is both true and false). Since contradictions cannot exist, not-S must be false, so S is true. The classic example: the square root of 2 is irrational.

Scheme

When to use which

Use direct proof when the definitions unpack cleanly into algebra. Use contrapositive when the conclusion is easier to negate than to prove directly (especially "if even then even" patterns). Use contradiction when you need to prove something does not exist (irrationals, infinitely many primes).

Scheme
Neighbors