← back to finance II

Dynamic Portfolio Choice

MIT OCW 18.S096 + 15.450 (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

Static optimization picks weights once. Dynamic portfolio choice adjusts allocations over time as wealth, market conditions, and the investment horizon change. The Bellman equation turns a T-period problem into T one-period problems, each informed by the future.

t=0 choose w₀ t=1 t=T up down V(W,t) = max E[V(W',t+1)]

Multi-period optimization

A myopic (single-period) investor maximizes E[U(W1)]. A dynamic investor maximizes E[U(WT)] by choosing a sequence of allocations w0, w1, ..., wT-1. With CRRA utility and i.i.d. returns, the myopic solution happens to be optimal. But when returns are predictable or the horizon matters (as with labor income), the dynamic solution differs.

Scheme

Rebalancing rules

Drift pushes the portfolio away from target weights. Calendar rebalancing resets weights on a fixed schedule (monthly, quarterly). Threshold rebalancing triggers only when a weight deviates beyond a band (e.g., +/-5%). Threshold rebalancing trades less often but captures larger mispricings. Transaction costs determine which rule dominates.

Scheme

Dynamic programming and the Bellman equation

The Bellman equation decomposes a T-period problem into nested one-period problems: V(W,t) = maxw E[V(W', t+1)]. Solve backwards from the terminal condition V(W,T) = U(W). At each step, the optimal weight depends on current wealth and time remaining. This is the fundamental tool of dynamic optimization.

Scheme

Merton's continuous-time portfolio problem

Merton (1969) solved the portfolio problem in continuous time. With CRRA utility and a single risky asset following geometric Brownian motion, the optimal stock allocation is w* = (μ − r) / (γ σ²). The result is constant over time and independent of wealth—a striking simplicity. It says: the more risk-averse you are (higher γ), or the more volatile the asset (higher σ), the less you hold.

Scheme

Horizon effects and lifecycle investing

Young investors have more human capital (future labor income), which acts like a bond. So they should hold more stocks. As retirement approaches, the bond-like human capital shrinks, and the portfolio should shift toward bonds. This is the theoretical basis for target-date funds. The glide path is not arbitrary—it follows from the Bellman equation with labor income as a state variable.

Scheme
Neighbors